DBF Mass FAQ

DBF Mass's area calculations are based on industry-standard GFA formulas and building geometry. We've worked closely with architecture professionals to ensure accuracy. All calculations are transparent and update in real-time. We recommend reviewing outputs with your team before final submissions.


Yes, DBF Mass supports multiple import formats including DXF, GeoJSON, SHP, and OBJ for site boundaries and context. You can bring your existing site data directly into the platform.


The analytics dashboard and 3D visualization update in real-time as you make changes to massing, programs, or parameters. All area calculations refresh instantly with every adjustment.


Yes, DBF Mass exports to formats compatible with major BIM tools including Revit and ArchiCAD. You can download DXF files for CAD workflows and Excel files for area schedules. The platform is designed to fit seamlessly into your existing design workflow.


Currently, DBF Mass focuses on building massing and area calculations for feasibility studies. For detailed unit division and parking layout, we recommend exporting your preferred massing to specialized tools or developing layouts in your BIM software. You can use color-coded zones to indicate unit types and manually define parking areas.


DBF Mass includes parametric setback and offset controls to test zoning compliance scenarios. For automated compliance checking (shadow casting, sky factor, diagonal limits), see our Japan-specific version. Other regions require manual input of zoning parameters.


DBF Mass is designed to support your design process with area calculations and feasibility analysis. While we've taken utmost care in accuracy, we recommend verifying outputs with relevant team members or consultants before submissions. DBF Mass is a design tool, not a substitute for professional review.


Yes! We're currently offering personalized 30-minute demos where you can see DBF Mass in action and test it with your own project data. We also offer a 14-day free trial with full platform access. Book your demo using the link above.


vs. Autodesk Forma: More flexible massing controls, better 3D visualization quality, more parametric adjustment options
vs. TestFit/Finch: Superior visual presentation quality, better geospatial integration, more sophisticated 3D environment
vs. Grasshopper: No coding required, more intuitive for non-technical users, faster learning curve